Open-source software and standards for creating music |
|
OpenMuseHomeTransportsPerformanceEthernet/IPIntroduction Overview Comparisons Assessments Open IssuesSupplementAddressing Primer Standards Bodies References |
Overview of Current Activity in MIDI Over IPSignificant current efforts include MWPP, DMIDI, NetMIDI, MIDIOverLAN+ and iMIDI: MWPPMWPP - MIDI Wire Packetization Protocol - is the IETF effort to define a standard protocol for transporting MIDI using the Internet standard for streaming media: RTP. It is a serious and ambitious effort that is well advanced. The MWPP work is led by John Lazzarro and John Wawrzynek of UC Berkeley. Unlike other efforts, MWPP is designed for both LAN and WAN (wide-area Internet) applications. Status: Well advanced, under active development DMIDIDMIDI - Distributed MIDI - is a networked MIDI protocol allowing
the transmission and reception of MIDI data within a LAN environment. The IEEE
has recently formed a Working Group to assess DMIDI as a standard for MIDI event
transmission within local area networks. Status: Stable open-source protocol; recently submitted to IEEE URL: http://dmidi.org NetMIDINetMIDI was developed to support MIDI Show Control applications and is currently marketed by Richmond Sound Design as part of its E-Show product line. NetMIDI supports Windows 2000/XP. The underlying technology is similar to DMIDI. Status: In commercial use for several years MIDIOverLAN+MIDIOverLAN+ is an inexpensive ($39) utility which provides enhanced MIDI routing capabilities for one or more networked computers. It supports Windows 9x/ME/2000/XP. Reviews and anecdotal reports give it high marks for performance, flexibility and ease of installation and use. Status: Commercial product for 1+ years (predecessor: MIDIReplicator) iMIDIiMIDI is a recent, experimental utility which provides MIDI over Ethernet capabilities for Mac OS X. It claims to support "MIDI synchronization and light MIDI traffic." While the other approaches generally use UDP, iMIDI uses TCP; since TCP has much more overhead and latency than UDP, iMIDI performance is likely worse than NetMIDI, DMIDI or MIDIOverLAN. (UDP and TCP are discussed further below.) Status: Experimental; clear performance problems |
Copyright 2003 Jim Wright. All Rights Reserved. Legal Stuff |